2025
Design and Methodology of a Real Estate Fund Index for the Czech Market
ČERNOHORSKÝ, AdamZákladní údaje
Originální název
Design and Methodology of a Real Estate Fund Index for the Czech Market
Autoři
ČERNOHORSKÝ, Adam
Vydání
ACTA VSFS, Prague, University of Finance and Administration, 2025, 1802-792X
Další údaje
Jazyk
angličtina
Typ výsledku
Článek v odborném periodiku
Obor
50200 5.2 Economics and Business
Stát vydavatele
Česká republika
Utajení
není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Organizační jednotka
Vysoká škola finanční a správní
Klíčová slova česky
Real Estate, Investment Funds, Market Benchmarking, Czech Capital Market, Index Construction
Klíčová slova anglicky
Real Estate, Investment Funds, Market Benchmarking, Czech Capital Market, Index Construction
Příznaky
Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změněno: 11. 10. 2025 12:04, Ing. Adam Černohorský, Ph.D.
V originále
Background: The Czech real estate market has experienced rapid growth in recent years, driven by macroeconomic trends and limited housing supply. Retail investors face increasing barriers to direct property ownership, prompting a shift toward real estate investment funds (REIFs). However, the lack of a standardized performance benchmark hinders market transparency and comparability. Objective: This study aims to design a dual-index framework to benchmark the performance of Czech real estate investment funds. It investigates how fund structure, size, and investor segmentation affect index behaviour and evaluates the implications of different methodological approaches. Methods: Two types of indices, arithmetic and NAV-weighted, were constructed separately for retail and qualified investor funds. Data were collected quarterly from 39 real estate funds, with inclusion based on data availability and reporting consistency. Indices were computed using Python-based time-series processing, with quarterly rebalancing and weight capping to reduce concentration risk. Results: Qualified investor funds achieved higher average returns and exhibited lower performance dispersion. In contrast, retail funds displayed greater heterogeneity, and the weighted index was strongly influenced by a single large, underperforming fund. The arithmetic index proved sensitive to outliers, while the weighted index highlighted capital concentration effects. Recommendation: Investors and analysts should use both index types for a comprehensive performance view. Policymakers should encourage broader data disclosure and consider the systemic impact of dominant funds on retail benchmarks. Practical relevance: The indices provide a transparent benchmarking tool for market participants, enabling better performance evaluation and investment decision-making. The framework also supports regulatory efforts to enhance market maturity. Originality/value: This study is the first to introduce a dual real estate fund index for the Czech market. It provides an analytically sound and practically applicable model for benchmarking performance across investor segments, with methodological insights relevant to other emerging real estate markets.
Česky
Background: The Czech real estate market has experienced rapid growth in recent years, driven by macroeconomic trends and limited housing supply. Retail investors face increasing barriers to direct property ownership, prompting a shift toward real estate investment funds (REIFs). However, the lack of a standardized performance benchmark hinders market transparency and comparability. Objective: This study aims to design a dual-index framework to benchmark the performance of Czech real estate investment funds. It investigates how fund structure, size, and investor segmentation affect index behaviour and evaluates the implications of different methodological approaches. Methods: Two types of indices, arithmetic and NAV-weighted, were constructed separately for retail and qualified investor funds. Data were collected quarterly from 39 real estate funds, with inclusion based on data availability and reporting consistency. Indices were computed using Python-based time-series processing, with quarterly rebalancing and weight capping to reduce concentration risk. Results: Qualified investor funds achieved higher average returns and exhibited lower performance dispersion. In contrast, retail funds displayed greater heterogeneity, and the weighted index was strongly influenced by a single large, underperforming fund. The arithmetic index proved sensitive to outliers, while the weighted index highlighted capital concentration effects. Recommendation: Investors and analysts should use both index types for a comprehensive performance view. Policymakers should encourage broader data disclosure and consider the systemic impact of dominant funds on retail benchmarks. Practical relevance: The indices provide a transparent benchmarking tool for market participants, enabling better performance evaluation and investment decision-making. The framework also supports regulatory efforts to enhance market maturity. Originality/value: This study is the first to introduce a dual real estate fund index for the Czech market. It provides an analytically sound and practically applicable model for benchmarking performance across investor segments, with methodological insights relevant to other emerging real estate markets.