MERTL, Jan. Karel Engliš’s Teleological Approach and the Configuration of Health Care Systems. In Veronika Nálepová. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Economic and Social Policy. Ostrava: Vysoká škola PRIGO. s. 279-290. ISBN 978-80-87291-27-6. 2020.
Další formáty:   BibTeX LaTeX RIS
Základní údaje
Originální název Karel Engliš’s Teleological Approach and the Configuration of Health Care Systems
Název česky Teleologický přístup Karla Engliše a konfigurace systémů zdravotní péče
Název anglicky Karel Engliš’s Teleological Approach and the Configuration of Health Care Systems
Autoři MERTL, Jan (203 Česká republika, garant, domácí).
Vydání Ostrava, Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference Economic and Social Policy, od s. 279-290, 12 s. 2020.
Nakladatel Vysoká škola PRIGO
Další údaje
Originální jazyk čeština
Typ výsledku Stať ve sborníku
Obor 50200 5.2 Economics and Business
Stát vydavatele Česká republika
Utajení není předmětem státního či obchodního tajemství
Forma vydání elektronická verze "online"
WWW URL
Kód RIV RIV/04274644:_____/20:#0000754
Organizační jednotka Vysoká škola finanční a správní
ISBN 978-80-87291-27-6
Klíčová slova česky Zdravotní systém, teleologický přístup, fiskální politika, zdravotní pojištění
Klíčová slova anglicky Health System; Teleological Approach; Fiscal Policy; Health Insurance
Štítky AR 2020-2021, odmeny_2021, RIV_2022, xD2
Příznaky Mezinárodní význam, Recenzováno
Změnil Změnila: Pavlína Ondrová, učo 17661. Změněno: 21. 3. 2022 09:35.
Anotace
This paper’s aim is to reintroduce the teleological approach formulated by professor Karel Engliš approximately hundred years ago showing it as a highly useful analytical tool for social systems, including the health one. Engliš enriched the positive and normative approach of scientific analysis with teleological one, using postulates based on the principle of finality, and distinguished it both from positive causality and narrow normative measures or legal norms. Because health economics often struggles with handling the plurality of health systems, it is worth to search in theory for approaches that will improve this deficit and Engliš’s approach has shown as perfectly suitable for this purpose. We therefore briefly explain the logic behind it, that was thoroughly defended in the literature in 1920s and 1930s. Then we search for specific attributes of four different health systems and sum the up into a table which briefly combines social models, fiscal and tax policy measures and ideals/postulates that those systems are based on. The result is better understanding of the health systems configuration and solid theoretical knowledge behind it, easing the need for finding the optimal or “most effective” health system by recognizing that more important is to know which properties and characteristics it should have and which principles it is built on.
Anotace anglicky
This paper’s aim is to reintroduce the teleological approach formulated by professor Karel Engliš approximately hundred years ago showing it as a highly useful analytical tool for social systems, including the health one. Engliš enriched the positive and normative approach of scientific analysis with teleological one, using postulates based on the principle of finality, and distinguished it both from positive causality and narrow normative measures or legal norms. Because health economics often struggles with handling the plurality of health systems, it is worth to search in theory for approaches that will improve this deficit and Engliš’s approach has shown as perfectly suitable for this purpose. We therefore briefly explain the logic behind it, that was thoroughly defended in the literature in 1920s and 1930s. Then we search for specific attributes of four different health systems and sum the up into a table which briefly combines social models, fiscal and tax policy measures and ideals/postulates that those systems are based on. The result is better understanding of the health systems configuration and solid theoretical knowledge behind it, easing the need for finding the optimal or “most effective” health system by recognizing that more important is to know which properties and characteristics it should have and which principles it is built on.
VytisknoutZobrazeno: 28. 3. 2024 17:42