Další formáty:
BibTeX
LaTeX
RIS
@inproceedings{10054,
author = {Ulrychová, Eva and Majovská, Renata and Tesař, Petr},
address = {Prague},
booktitle = {Efficiency and Responsibility in Education 2022 : Proceedings of the 19th International Conference},
edition = {1st ed.},
editor = {Fejfar, Jiří a Martin Flégl (eds.)},
keywords = {Form of examination; mathematics; online exam; statistical evaluation; written test},
howpublished = {elektronická verze "online"},
language = {eng},
location = {Prague},
isbn = {978-80-213-3197-6},
note = {Konference z roku 2020 ve WoS, 2021 ne},
pages = {165-171},
publisher = {Czech University of Life Sciences Prague},
title = {STANDARD FORM VS. TWO ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS IN MATHEMATICS},
url = {https://erie.pef.czu.cz/en/r-18415-proceedings-2022/proceedings-2022.html},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR
ID - 10054
AU - Ulrychová, Eva - Majovská, Renata - Tesař, Petr
PY - 2022
TI - STANDARD FORM VS. TWO ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS IN MATHEMATICS
PB - Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
CY - Prague
SN - 9788021331976
N1 - Konference z roku 2020 ve WoS, 2021 ne
KW - Form of examination
KW - mathematics
KW - online exam
KW - statistical evaluation
KW - written test
UR - https://erie.pef.czu.cz/en/r-18415-proceedings-2022/proceedings-2022.html
N2 - The aim of this article is to describe and compare the results of written examinations in mathematics at the University of Finance and Administration in Prague, which were conducted in three different forms: standard (face-to-face), correspondence (individual test preparation sent electronically for checking) and online (under the direct supervision of an examiner via camera). The main objective is to determine whether the two alternative forms (correspondence or online) are suitable substitutes for the standard form. For a better comparison, the results of the summer semesters of three consecutive academic years, when a different form of examination was used each time, are used. Statistical evaluation showed that standard and correspondence forms of testing led to similar student performance, while students were less successful online. Possible reasons for the results are analysed.
ER -
ULRYCHOVÁ, Eva, Renata MAJOVSKÁ a Petr TESAŘ. STANDARD FORM VS. TWO ALTERNATIVE FORMS OF WRITTEN EXAMINATIONS IN MATHEMATICS. In Fejfar, Jiří a Martin Flégl (eds.). \textit{Efficiency and Responsibility in Education 2022 : Proceedings of the 19th International Conference}. 1st ed. Prague: Czech University of Life Sciences Prague. s.~165-171. ISBN~978-80-213-3197-6. 2022.
|
