@book{8008,
   author = {Frait, Jan and Bezvoda, Michal and Budinský, Petr and Černohorská, Liběna and Daňhel, Jaroslav and Ducháčková, Eva and Hájek, Jan and Hejlová, Hana and Helísek, Mojmír and Kadlčáková, Narcisa and Komárek, Luboš and Komárková, Zlatuše and Plašil, Miroslav and Radová, Jarmila and Rusnák, Marek and Stádník, Bohumil and Teplý, Petr},
   address = {Prague},
   doi = {http://dx.doi.org/10.37355/03.2019/2},
   edition = {1.},
   keywords = {systemic risk; financial markets},
   howpublished = {tištěná verze "print"},
   language = {eng},
   location = {Prague},
   isbn = {978-80-7408-200-9},
   note = {Frait: 15 % Budinský: 4 % Helísek: 10 % Komárek: 6 % Komárková: 5 %},
   publisher = {University of Finance and Administration},
   title = {SYSTEMIC RISK IN POST-CRISIS FINANCIAL MARKETS},
   year = {2019}
}

TY  - BOOK
ID  - 8008
AU  - Frait, Jan - Bezvoda, Michal - Budinský, Petr - Černohorská, Liběna - Daňhel, Jaroslav - Ducháčková, Eva - Hájek, Jan - Hejlová, Hana - Helísek, Mojmír - Kadlčáková, Narcisa - Komárek, Luboš - Komárková, Zlatuše - Plašil, Miroslav - Radová, Jarmila - Rusnák, Marek - Stádník, Bohumil - Teplý, Petr
PY  - 2019
TI  - SYSTEMIC RISK IN POST-CRISIS FINANCIAL MARKETS
VL  - SCIENCEpress
PB  - University of Finance and Administration
CY  - Prague
SN  - 9788074082009
N1  - Frait: 15 % Budinský: 4 % Helísek: 10 % Komárek: 6 % Komárková: 5 %
KW  - systemic risk
KW  - financial markets
N2  - The global financial crisis that started in 2007 represented a striking example of under-estimating risks of systemic nature. Both the academic research and the financial market regulation had overly focused on individual institutions’ risks in pre-crisis years. However, they had underestimated the risks across individual markets and financial institutions as well as their potential impact on asset prices. Moreover, risks were underestimated in terms of the macro-economically and financially stable economic environment, i.e. low-volatility and prosperous economic environment. This had resulted in strong risk appetite, and low risk aversion leading to overly low risk premiums, consequently causing optimistic expectations with regard to the future development of returns and general economic performance. Both international and national authorities responded to global financial crisis by plethora of regulatory changes. Systemic risk was acknowledged and macroprudential policies were instituted. Although the regulatory and economic/political response to the crisis mitigated number of problems, it likely failed to address fully the sources of systemic risk. First, it is because the regulatory overhaul focused primarily on the banking sectors opening thus avenues for systemic risk in other sectors. Second, some new sources of systemic risks emerged often associated with accommodative monetary policies of central banks.
ER  - 

FRAIT, Jan, Michal BEZVODA, Petr BUDINSKÝ, Liběna ČERNOHORSKÁ, Jaroslav DAŇHEL, Eva DUCHÁČKOVÁ, Jan HÁJEK, Hana HEJLOVÁ, Mojmír HELÍSEK, Narcisa KADLČÁKOVÁ, Luboš KOMÁREK, Zlatuše KOMÁRKOVÁ, Miroslav PLAŠIL, Jarmila RADOVÁ, Marek RUSNÁK, Bohumil STÁDNÍK a Petr TEPLÝ. \textit{SYSTEMIC RISK IN POST-CRISIS FINANCIAL MARKETS}. 1. vyd. Prague: University of Finance and Administration, 2019. 154 s. SCIENCEpress. ISBN~978-80-7408-200-9. doi:10.37355/03.2019/2.